Surprise! This week, I launched my own show on LotusEaters.com — Tomlinson Talks.
I’ll be live every Wednesday at 15:00 PM (UK time) from now on, discussing what’s gone on this week in Westminster with some distinguished guests.
The first episode featured Sound Investigations’ undercover reporter Arden Young, who explained why the internet’s largest pornography provider fail to prevent minors from accessing its websites, and why its employees have failed to remove illegal content in the past.
You can watch a preview clip of our discussion here:
For the first half an hour of the inaugural episode, I discussed how the government’s plans to subsidise institutional childcare for infants from nine months old will engender insecure attachment styles and predispositions for psychological disorders in children.
This will raise a generation of resentful revolutionaries, who will burn civilisation down to feel the warmth of the parents that the state made absent throughout their childhoods.
To watch the full episode, and to watch next week’s discussion with Rob Henderson, subscribe to LotusEaters.com for a little as £5.00 a month.
The Daycare Industrial Complex
For a condensed version of the topic covered in my first episode of Tomlinson Talks, I wrote an essay in The European Conservative this week on why subsidising the Daycare Industrial Complex will not avert the disastrous decline in birth rates in Europe and the Anglosphere.
Institutional child care neither serves the interest of the mother, who would rather be at home, nor the child, whose development is impaired through no fault of their own. So whose interests does it serve?
Childcare policies are premised on the belief that the primary purpose of human beings is not to beget and belong to families, but to produce abundant wealth.
As an aspiring father in the next few years, the pressure government policy places on the viability of a single-income household is of great concern to me.
It is apparent that, if the goal were to reduce economic reliance on mass immigration and encourage indigenous Brits to have more children, then the government is not enacting policies to achieve that.
But instead, it is apparent that all culture, nature, and quality of life for vulnerable dependents is to be sacrificed at the altar of perpetual GDP growth.
There exists a perverse incentive to do this in democratic systems: as economic growth and productivity stagnate, a government might look to commodify the domestic sphere to fudge the numbers ahead of the next election.
The managerial state is driving the family unit to extinction, for expediently balanced spreadsheets.
“That’s what Woke is: it’s Gay Race Communism.”
Had the pleasure of joining my friend Lewis Brackpool on the second episode of his new podcast, The State of It, for a discussion of the media landscape, why the Right is infested with sandbagging Liberalism, the definition of Woke, and why the most popular Red Pill influencers are indistinguishable from Feminists.
Watch or listen now on YouTube, Rumble, and Spotify.
We Are All Extremists Now
In two consecutive segments for the Podcast of the Lotus Eaters this week, I covered the UK government’s redefinition of ‘Extremism’ — which conveniently encompasses any of their critics who accuse them of not being conservative enough, and betraying the democratic mandate which has consistently voted for lower levels of immigration.
Yet again, scaremongering about the Far Right, the government has insisted on the need to protect ‘democracy’ and ‘British values’, while importing hundreds of thousands of people whose sympathies lie more with a proscribed terror group in Gaza than with Britain.
Noting that, however, will result in being called a ‘Hate Monster’ and an ‘entitled white males’ by the Scottish Police, and logged on a non-crime hate-incident database.
It will soon be criminalised under the next Labour government’s adoption of the All-Party Parliamentary Definition of Islamophobia — which, if applied consistently, would also criminalise verses of the Quran, and statements made by the founder of Tell MAMA.
But it won’t be applied equally, because the blade only ever cuts one way: against the native population who object to the unwanted transformation of their communities and nation.
Net Migration and Slavery Reparations
In two Talk TV clips I forgot to draw attention to in last week’s newsletter, I discussed the Office for Budget Responsibility’s new forecast of rising minimum levels of net migration, snuck into Hunt’s Spring Budget, with Julia Hartley-Brewer; and debated a representative of the Inclusive Church about the £1bn pledged by the Anglicans to ‘slavery reparations’, hundreds of years after the unique and expensive crusade by the British Emprie to end the international slave trade.
That’s all for this week; but next Sunday, keep your eyes on Triggernometry for the release of a long-awaited interview…